One-Minute Book Reviews

December 31, 2006

Literary Contest Final Clue (#5)! Guess the Title of the Best Book I Read in 2006

Filed under: Uncategorized — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 3:38 pm

It’s here: the last clue in the first One-Minute Book Reviews Literary Contest! You still have a chance win a copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books by identifying the title and author of the best book I read in 2006. Leave a comment with your guess on any contest post (or write to oneminutebookreviews@hotmail.com and give me permission to post your comment for you) by 8 a.m. Eastern Time Jan. 1.

The first four clues appeared daily starting on Thursday. I’ll post a review of the book on Jan. 1 and the name of the winner on Jan. 2. Here’s the last clue:

Clue #5: The author of this biography is a man who shares a name with a “lordly” English poet.

Watch this site for other contests. In 2007 you’ll be able to win books just by linking to One-Minute Book Reviews from another site. And you’ll be able to win bestsellers and other books reviewed on this blog. This is a great way to get free books to consider for a book club or donate to a school, library or day-care center with a small book budget. So if you don’t want to enter, why not send the link for this site to a friend?

To avoid missing these contests, please bookmark www.oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Janice Harayda
© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

December 30, 2006

The Best Grammar Book for Students (And Parents Who Are Checking the Homework Assignments)

Filed under: Children's Books,How to — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 2:14 pm

Patricia T. O’Conner makes it fun to learn the rules that – not which – your child needs to know

Woe Is I: The Grammarphobe’s Guide to Better English in Plain English. By Patricia T. O’Conner. Riverhead, 256 pp., $14, paperback. Ages 13–adult.

By Janice Harayda

A few weeks ago, I got an e-mail note from a parent who had a grammar question. His English teachers had told him that when two parts of a sentence are joined by and or but, you should always separate them with a comma. His teenage son’s teachers said his teachers were wrong. Who was right? Answer: the son’s teachers. You use a comma to separate two parts of a sentence when both have a subject and verb. You don’t use a comma when they don’t. I gave my friend this example of two correctly punctuated sentences:

I went to the store, and I bought some bread.
I went to the store and bought some bread.

If you and your child are wrestling with questions like these, you need Patricia T. O’Conner’s Woe Is I, the best grammar book for students (and their parents). Woe Is I has all the hallmarks of an ideal grammar book for modern families. It’s comprehensive enough to answer any question you might have. It’s authoritative without handing down archaic rules that no longer make sense. It has an index and chapter titles that make it easy to find the answers you need, whether you wonder when to use that and which or whether it’s ever all right to use alright (no). And O’Conner has a conversational — but not sloppy – writing style that makes her book fun to use. A chapter on commas, for example, is called “Comma Sutra.”

Woe is I also has things that most grammar books don’t. One is a chapter on clichés that lists nearly 100 overworked words or phrases and what’s wrong with each. Some of my favorites lines from it:

“Bone of contention. This expression is getting osteoporosis.
Generation gap. An even worse cliché, Generation X, is already geriatric.
It goes without saying. Then don’t say it.
“Team player. When your boss says you should be more of a team player, that means she wants you to take on more of her work.
To the manner born. If you’re going to use a cliché, respect it. This Shakespearean phrase (it comes from Hamlet) means ‘accustomed to’ or ‘familiar with’ a manner of living. It is not ‘to the manor born’ and has nothing to do with manor houses

O’Conner is too permissive for my tastes on some issues, such as whether you can use since to mean because and who instead of whom. But she offers so much good advice not just on grammar but on writing in general that I put Woe Is I on the required reading list for a college journalism class I taught recently. If you think your child could never enjoy grammar, listen to what one student said about after reading the first chapter I assigned: “I love this book! It’s the funniest textbook I’ve had to read.”

Best line: “English is a glorious invention, one that gives us endless possibilities for expressing ourselves. Grammar is there to help, to clear up ambiguities and prevent misunderstandings.”

Worst line: O’Conner says it’s fine to use since to mean “because.” But she admits that this could cause problems in a phrase such as, “Since we spoke, I’ve had second thoughts”: “In that case, since could mean either ‘from the time that’ or ‘because,’ so it’s better to be more precise.” Similar problems could occur in a lot of other situations. So why not stick to the rule that calls for using since only to indicate a time period (such as, “since Thursday”)?

Recommended if … you could use help with your grammar, English, or writing.

Caveat reader: This review was based on the hardcover edition. Woe Is I is a book for adults that is also appropriate for students in the eighth grade and above. It may appeal to some sixth- and seventh-graders who read well.

Published: 2003 (Riverhead hardcover), 2004 (Riverhead paperback).

FYI: A former member of the staff of The New York Times Book Review, O’Conner answers grammar questions on her Web site www.grammarphobia.com. She also appears on National Public Radio as a language expert.

© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

Literary Contest Clue Number #4 — Only Two More Days to Guess the Best Book I Read in 2006

Filed under: Uncategorized — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 12:06 pm

Only two more days to win a free copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books!

You can win a copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books by becoming the first person to guess correctly the best book I read in 2006. The first clue appeared on Thursday, and a new clue will appear every day through Dec. 31 (tomorrow). I will review the book and give a short excerpt from it on Jan. 1 and announce the winner on Jan. 2.

To enter, leave a comment on any contest post with title and author of the book you think I read. If you get “error” messages when you try to leave a comment, send an e-mail note to oneminutebookreviews@hotmail.com with your guess, and give me permission to post it for you under the name on your e-mail address. If you do this, I will post your guess for you, and will get credit for having sent it at the time on your e-mail, not the time I post it.

Clue #4: Here’s one of the most famous lines written by the female author who is the subject of the biography you’re trying to guess:

“ … for the growing good of the world is partly dependent on unhistoric acts; and that things are not so ill with you and me as they might have been, is half owing to the number who lived faithfully a hidden life, and rest in unvisited tombs.”

This is one of my favorite lines in all of literature.

Janice Harayda

© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

December 29, 2006

Your Management Sucks: No, This Book Does

Filed under: How to — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 2:58 pm

Looking for a manager to emulate? How about Donald Rumsfeld?

Your Management Sucks: Why You Have to Declare War on Yourself … and Your Business. By Mark Stevens. Crown Business, 302 pp., $25.

By Janice Harayda

Business books are among the cesspools of the publishing industry. For every Liar’s Poker or Barbarians at the Gate, there are countless volumes that take sewerage disposal to new depths.

The latest deposit in the cesspool comes from Mark Stevens, the CEO of a “global marketing firm” and author of the earlier – what, you haven’t heard of it? – Your Marketing Sucks. Stevens argues that managers must “declare war” on themselves and their companies to survive in a cutthroat marketplace. And early on he gives an example of a leader who embodies his philosophy — the chief architect of the war that has killed nearly 3,000 members of the U.S. military in Iraq. As secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld shook up the Pentagon, so that “cliques of generals learned the hard way (for Rumsfeld and for them, because these conflicts are always bloody) that the secretary was driving through their barricades.”

The tin ear Stevens shows here – for language and human suffering – doesn’t go away in chapters on developing your “killer app” and unleashing “your Manhattan Project.” He assaults you with so many clichés, you begin to think that the Guinness world-records people should add a category for him. One stupefying passage deals with what happens when companies focus on small goals instead of big ones:

“I think of it as the shooting-fish-in-barrel syndrome … When a business grows beyond initial projections, once it appears to defy gravity and build a powerful momentum, managers can become intoxicated by this magic-carpet ride and believe that from that moment on the future is golden. Guaranteed. A sure thing. And that’s when they put the plane on autopilot and a hard landing looms in the not-so-distant future.”

Stevens believes that “weak managers” tell people they can spend time “with their kids every night.” But research has shown that employees in their 20s and 30s care far more about such issues than their parents did, and options such as flextime help to retain high performers. If Stevens is aware of the studies, he gives no indication of it, and such omissions make his book read a times as though it emerged from a time capsule buried in the heyday of some of the people he holds up as models – Walt Disney, Henry Ford, Lee Iacocca, Carl Icahn, Estée Lauder, George Patton, and Harry Truman. Your Management Sucks might be a battle cry, but it’s a call to the kind of war that Donald Rumsfeld scripted, and is becoming more unpopular every day.

Best Line: “When I say, ‘Your management sucks,’ I’m talking to myself as well.” You said it, not me.

Worst Line (Tie): Winner No. 1: “Forget the horse that looks like a camel because the committee created it. We’ve heard that too many times.” Then why is it in this book? Winner No. 2: “To hell with what clients expect to hear. To tell with what they want to hear. Shock them with intelligence! With epiphanies! With the element of surprise!” Better still, shock them by saying something that makes sense! Instead of inanities like, “Shock them … with the element of surprise!”

Published: May 2006

© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

Literary Contest Clue #3

Filed under: Uncategorized — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 1:12 pm

The latest clue in the One-Minute Book Reviews New Year’s Literary Contest …

Would you like to win a copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books? Be the first person to leave a comment on this site that identifies the author and title of the best book I read in 2006. (You can find a review of Pure Pleasure in the “Essays and Reviews” category at right.) The first clue appeared on Thursday, and a new clue will be posted each day through Dec. 31. Clues may be posted before or after the review-of-the-day.

On January 1’ll review the book and provide a brief excerpt from it. I’ll announce the winner on January 2. If you haven’t read the book, you’ll be able to figure it out from the clues if you’re willing to do a little sleuthing on the Web or elsewhere.

If you can’t leave a comment because of a software blockade, you can e-mail your guess to oneminutebookreviews@hotmail.com. I will post your comment for you if you give me permission to use the screen name for your e-mail address. You will get credit for the time that appears on your e-mail, not the time when I post the comment. Thank you for visiting One-Minute Book Reviews!

Clue #3: Henry James admired the subject of this book, but described her as “horse-faced.” We don’t know what animal she thought James’s face resembled.

Janice Harayda
© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

December 28, 2006

Literary Contest Clue #2: Guess the Best Book I Read in 2006

Filed under: Uncategorized — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 11:34 am

Can you guess the best book I read in 2006?

The first clue appeared on Dec. 27 on One-Minute Book Reviews, and a new clue will appear every day through Dec. 31. The first person to leave a comment on the site with the correct title and author of the book will win a copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books. A review of the book and a short excerpt will appear on January 1, and the winner will be announced on January 2.

If you study the clues, you’ll be able to figure out which book I’m talking about or make an intelligent guess — for example, by scrolling through related Amazon listings or an online card catalog – even if you haven’t read the book. For example, if a clue said that the best book I read in 2006 began with the words “Call me Ishmael,” you could figure out that it was Moby-Dick, right? The clues in this contest won’t be that obvious. But you may see a few lines from a book that will tip you off to the answer.

If you would like to leave a comment but are having trouble getting past the WordPress software blockade, send your comment to oneminutebookreviews@hotmail.com along with a line giving me permission to paste-in your comment under the screen name on your e-mail. Your comment will be credited at the time listed on the e-mail, not when I post it here. Many apologies for any inconveniences to non-WordPress users.

Hint: Keep in mind that I said I read the book in 2006, not that it was published in 2006.

Clue #2: The lead-ins to programs on Masterpiece Theatre are usually harmless enough to draw little criticism from reviewers. A rare exception occurred when Russell Baker introduced a miniseries based on perhaps the most famous book by the author who is the subject of this biography. Some critics accused him of pandering to television viewers.

Today’s book review appears below this post and deals with James Johnson’s Soul Sanctuary, a celebration of black worship styles such as the “Watch Night” services that take place on New Year’s Eve.

Janice Harayda
© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

December 27, 2006

Literary Contest! Guess the Best Book I Read in 2006 and Win a Signed Copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books

Filed under: Uncategorized — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 2:02 pm

Start your year by winning a great collection of essays on modern classics … or helping a friend win by forwarding this post

On New Year’s Day I will review and post a short excerpt from the best book I read in 2006. I will provide a clue to the identity of the book every day from now through Dec. 31 on One-Minute Book Reviews in addition to a book review.

If you think you know the book, leave a comment on a post that contains a clue, such as this post, and include the title and author of the book. I will sign a copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books and send it to the first person who correctly guesses the author and title of the mystery book. (You can find a review of Carey’s book archived in the “Essays and Reviews” category on this blog.) In order to win, you must include the full correct title and author’s name as they appear on the cover, title page, or a listing in a library catalog or on Amazon.

I will announce the winner on January 2 and, if he or she has come to this blog through a link from another site, I will also mention and link to the site.

Ardent readers should have less trouble with this contest than a young cousin and I had on Christmas Eve when we tried to get to the hangman game that reveals the title of the next Harry Potter novel on J.K. Rowling’s site, www.jkrowling.com. (Yes, we knew people had posted directions to thegame on the Web, but we wanted to do it ourselves.) So if you don’t want to try to win the book, why not forward a link to www.oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com to a literary friend who might enjoy it?

To avoid missing clues, please bookmark this site or subscribe to the RSS feed.

Clue #1: The book is a biography of a female author.

Janice Harayda
© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

Coming This Week (Dec. 24) on One-Minute Book Reviews

Filed under: Uncategorized — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 1:34 pm

The following books are tentatively scheduled to be reviewed during the week of Dec. 24 on One-Minute Book Reviews. This blog will provide a new clue to the New Year’s Literary Contest each day from Dec. 27–Dec. 31.

Monday: Merry Christmas. (A review of Kay Ryan’s The Niagara River: Poems, which would have have appeared Dec. 25, was posted as an extra review on Saturday, Dec. 23.)
Tuesday: A House Somewhere: Tales of Life Abroad. Edited by Don George and Anthony Sattin (Essays, Lonely Planet) Posted
Wednesday, Post #1: I Don’t Know How She Does It: The Life of Kate Reddy, Working Mother. By Allison Pearson. (Novel, Anchor Books) Posted
Wednesday, Post #2: Introducing the New Year’s Literary Contest that gives you a chance to win a copy of John Carey’s Pure Pleasure: A Guide to the 20th Century’s Most Enjoyable Books
Thursday: Soul Sanctuary: Images of the African-American Worship Experience. By Jason Miccolo Johnson. Foreword by Gordon Parks. Clue #2 New Year’s Literary Contest
Friday: Clue # 3 New Year’s Literary Contest
Saturday: Children’s Corner Clue #4 New Year’s Literary Contest
Sunday: Clue #5 (Final Clue) New Year’s Literary Contest

Reviews on this site typically alternate on a female author/male author basis with reviews of books by women appearing on Monday and Wednesdays and reviews of books by men appearing on Tuesdays and Thursdays. This format may vary during holiday weeks.

December 24, 2006

The Worst Writing in Books in 2006 – Nominate Your Candidates

Filed under: Delete Key Awards — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 12:25 am

You can fight back against bad writing and editing by nominating your candidates for the Delete Key Awards, which recognize authors who aren’t using their delete key enough

Did you read a book this year that was so bad, you wondered how it got published? Did you find sentences full of misspellings, clichés, bad grammar, or inaccuracies?

You can fight back against bad writing and editing by nominating your candidates for the first annual Delete Key Awards from One-Minute Book Reviews, which will recognize the worst writing published in a hardcover or paperback book in 2006.

Here’s how the awards work: Every review on One-Minute Book Reviews lists the best and worst lines in the book at the end of the review. Lists of the “worst of the worst” lines will begin appearing soon on this blog. The worst of those lines will become finalists for the Delete Key Awards for authors who aren’t using their delete key enough.

You can nominate bad sentences from books by leaving a comment on this post. All you have to do is list the title of a book, a bad sentence from it, and the page number for the line. (You can use the “Search Inside the Book” tool on Amazon to find some page numbers.) If you don’t have the page number, you can post the sentence, anyway, and someone else may be able to supply it. You can list just a sentence or add an explanation of why it doesn’t work. For examples of bad lines, use the search box at right to look for the titles of Claire Messud’s The Emperor’s Children, Danielle Steel’s Toxic Bachelors and Linda Kaplan Thaler and Robin Koval’s The Power of Nice.

If you can’t think of an author to nominate, why not send the link for this blog www.oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com to someone who might have ideas? How about that friend who keeps complaining about bad grammar in bestsellers or that book club member who never likes the selections of her group?

One-Minute Book Reviews is an independent literary blog created by Janice Harayda, an award-winning journalist has been the book columnist for Glamour, the book editor of The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer and a vice-president for awards the National Book Critics Circle. The site covers books by people “from presidents and kings to the scum of the earth,” as Lily Tomlin’s Ernestine might say. But it strives especially for parity for groups of authors often slighted by other media, including women, poets, and authors of books from overseas or small presses. At least 50 percent of the reviews on One-Minute Book Reviews cover books by women. Reviews typically alternate on a female author/male author basis, with reviews of books by women appearing on Mondays and Wednesdays and those by men on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The battle of the sexes is up for grabs on Fridays and in holiday weeks.

(c) 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

December 23, 2006

Kay Ryan’s ‘The Niagara River’: Poems That Rhyme, Like Life, in Unexpected Places

Filed under: Poetry — 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom @ 9:33 pm

An award-winning poet writes about what time steals from us

The Niagara River. By Kay Ryan. Grove Press: Grove Press Poetry Series, 72 pp., $13, paperback.

By Janice Harayda

Kay Ryan’s poetry captures better than any I know a quality of life that is obvious but rarely mentioned: It rhymes in unexpected places. Most of our lives resemble neither sonnets with fixed rhymes nor free verse with no rhymes. We hear music when we don’t expect it. So it is with Ryan’s sixth book, The Niagara River. Ryan rhymes the first word of one line with the last word of the next in “Absences and Breaks.” She begins with a rhyming couplet, “The egg-sucking fox/licks his copper chops,” but doesn’t stick to the pattern in “Theft.” This unpredictability might have been chaotic in the hands of a less talented poet. But Ryan has so much control over other aspects of her work, particularly tone, that the result is fresh instead of jarring.

In classical literature the river is dual symbol of life (because it sustains fertility) and death (because it suggests the irreversible flow of time). The 64 brief and intelligent poems in The Niagara River continue this tradition. The poems are autumnal but full of life and color. This is so partly because Ryan’s theme isn’t time in the abstract but what remains after it has passed. She has a sharp awareness of the inevitable injustices of age, reflected in the titles of poems such as “Thieves,” “Theft” and “Late Justice.” Time, the great racketeer, is always stealing from us. Ryan writes in “Thieves” s about the effects of age on the brain, including memory loss:

There are thieves
in the mind, their
dens in places
we’d prefer not to know.
When a word is lifted from
its spot, we show
no surprise,
replacing
supplies
with
provender.

Ryan does not sentimentalize the effects of aging – she knows that those thieves are hatching a “fantastic plot” – but her poems are not morbid. In “Salvage” she writes in about the aftermath of a wreck, perhaps a crash of the body caused by illness. The worst, she says, “has happened.” But there is a consolation:

Thanks be
to God – again –
for extractable elements
which are noi
carriers of pain …

Those lines notwithstanding, Ryan’s poems are not overtly religious. But at times their mood resembles that of the great Protestant hymn by Isaac Watts, “O, God, Our Help in Ages Past,” first published in the 18th century. Watts says:

Time like an ever-rolling steam,
bears all its sons away;
they fly forgotten, as a dream,
dies at the opening day.

In Ryan’s poetry, the dead do not become “stars or ghosts” when time “bears all its sons away.” Instead, she tells us in “Charms,” they reappear in our genes or elsewhere. This may be small comfort. But, she writes, “…E ven a piece/does us some good.”

Best line: One appears in a poem inspired by the artist Joseph Cornell: “ … As/time passes, the/promise is tattered/like a battle flag/above a war we/hope mattered.”

Worst line: None, but some of the quotes on the cover do Ryan few favors. David Yezzi says: “Ryan’s poems leave the reader elevated or changed or moved but at a loss to say exactly how this effect has been wrought.” The first part of that line is meaningless because all good poetry leaves you “elevated or changed or moved.” Otherwise, why read it? And a critic who says he can’t say how an effect “has been wrought” often means: I’m not willing to put the time or effort into figuring it out.

Recommended if … you like poetry that has both traditional and experimental elements.

Published: Octoer 2005

FYI: Poems in this collection have appeared in The Atlantic, The New Yorker, The American Scholar, and elsewhere. You can learn about Ryan and read her poem “Nothing Ventured” at the site for the Academy of American Poets, www.poets.org.

© 2006 Janice Harayda. All rights reserved.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.