<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women, Age and Hollywood – Quote of the Day From Tracey Jackson&#8217;s ‘Between and Rock and a Hot Place: Why 50 Is Not the New 30’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/women-age-and-hollywood-%E2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-from-tracey-jacksons-%E2%80%98between-and-rock-and-a-hot-place-why-50-is-not-the-new-30%E2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/women-age-and-hollywood-%e2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-from-tracey-jacksons-%e2%80%98between-and-rock-and-a-hot-place-why-50-is-not-the-new-30%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/women-age-and-hollywood-%e2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-from-tracey-jacksons-%e2%80%98between-and-rock-and-a-hot-place-why-50-is-not-the-new-30%e2%80%99/#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1minutebookreviewswordpresscom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=20999#comment-8223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your grad school professors were wise to emphasize staying power, because that&#039;s what it&#039;s all about in writing. So many young writers who get a lot of attention think it&#039;s going to last forever. They can&#039;t see far enough ahead to realize that next year, or five years from now, the New Yorker will have a new &quot;20 under 40&quot; list. And a lot of them have terrible problems, either personal or professional, when the waves of hype don&#039;t keep coming their way. I appreciate your perceptive comments ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your grad school professors were wise to emphasize staying power, because that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s all about in writing. So many young writers who get a lot of attention think it&#8217;s going to last forever. They can&#8217;t see far enough ahead to realize that next year, or five years from now, the New Yorker will have a new &#8220;20 under 40&#8243; list. And a lot of them have terrible problems, either personal or professional, when the waves of hype don&#8217;t keep coming their way. I appreciate your perceptive comments &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthropologist</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/women-age-and-hollywood-%e2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-from-tracey-jacksons-%e2%80%98between-and-rock-and-a-hot-place-why-50-is-not-the-new-30%e2%80%99/#comment-8220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anthropologist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=20999#comment-8220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I was in grad school, I was taught that writing is a craft.  Like any craft, our creative writing teachers told us, it gets better with practice.  The assumption was that, after getting one or two &quot;practice&quot; novels out of the way, you improved as time went along.  Maybe, I used to think, I&#039;ll hit my stride when I&#039;m in my 50s!  If I keep at it long enough.  

Back then, it seemed to me the emphasis was on &quot;tenacity,&quot; or staying power.  How long you were able to stay in the &quot;game&quot; without giving up.  A kind of &quot;last man standing.&quot;  I had classmates who became librarians, or entered another field entirely, within a few years of graduating from the Creative Writing Program.  I think only half of my batch of writers are still actively writing books today.  I&#039;m one of those &quot;survivors.&quot;

This is very different from what I see around me today.  The New Yorker, Granta, other top magazines emphasize &quot;20 Under 40&quot; and so forth.  So I guess writing is becoming more like Hollywood:  If you don&#039;t &quot;make it&quot; (i.e. land an agent and a big publisher) by the time you&#039;re 40, forget it.  So there&#039;s none of this &quot;pay your dues&quot; kind of thinking.  It&#039;s &quot;grab what you can now, because by the time you&#039;re 40, no one will be interested in what you have to say.&quot;

I think this does a dis-service to young writers, putting so much pressure on themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in grad school, I was taught that writing is a craft.  Like any craft, our creative writing teachers told us, it gets better with practice.  The assumption was that, after getting one or two &#8220;practice&#8221; novels out of the way, you improved as time went along.  Maybe, I used to think, I&#8217;ll hit my stride when I&#8217;m in my 50s!  If I keep at it long enough.  </p>
<p>Back then, it seemed to me the emphasis was on &#8220;tenacity,&#8221; or staying power.  How long you were able to stay in the &#8220;game&#8221; without giving up.  A kind of &#8220;last man standing.&#8221;  I had classmates who became librarians, or entered another field entirely, within a few years of graduating from the Creative Writing Program.  I think only half of my batch of writers are still actively writing books today.  I&#8217;m one of those &#8220;survivors.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is very different from what I see around me today.  The New Yorker, Granta, other top magazines emphasize &#8220;20 Under 40&#8243; and so forth.  So I guess writing is becoming more like Hollywood:  If you don&#8217;t &#8220;make it&#8221; (i.e. land an agent and a big publisher) by the time you&#8217;re 40, forget it.  So there&#8217;s none of this &#8220;pay your dues&#8221; kind of thinking.  It&#8217;s &#8220;grab what you can now, because by the time you&#8217;re 40, no one will be interested in what you have to say.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this does a dis-service to young writers, putting so much pressure on themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
