<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: J.D. Salinger&#8217;s &#8216;Tin Ear&#8217; in &#8216;The Catcher in the Rye&#8217; &#8212; Quote of the Day / Jonathan Yardley of the Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/j-d-salingers-tin-ear-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-quote-of-the-day-jonathan-yardley-of-the-washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/j-d-salingers-tin-ear-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-quote-of-the-day-jonathan-yardley-of-the-washington-post/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 15:11:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/j-d-salingers-tin-ear-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-quote-of-the-day-jonathan-yardley-of-the-washington-post/#comment-7957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1minutebookreviewswordpresscom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=18255#comment-7957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right that some writers do seem to attack books because it&#039;s fashionable. It&#039;s just that in this series, Jonathan Yardley seems to have liked more books than he disliked, so the theory doesn&#039;t work as well here as elsewhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right that some writers do seem to attack books because it&#8217;s fashionable. It&#8217;s just that in this series, Jonathan Yardley seems to have liked more books than he disliked, so the theory doesn&#8217;t work as well here as elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bippityboppityboom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/j-d-salingers-tin-ear-in-the-catcher-in-the-rye-quote-of-the-day-jonathan-yardley-of-the-washington-post/#comment-7956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bippityboppityboom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 01:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=18255#comment-7956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have never entirely understood why Salinger&#039;s novel is so highly regarded; I love &quot;The Old Man and the Sea&quot;, a book which, despite its slender spine, takes some effort to finish.  

Regardless, I can&#039;t help but feel that it is at least somewhat fashionable for a reviewer to attack books that are held in high esteem.  Dale Peck certainly comes to mind.  (I&#039;m sure one could argue that reviewers are similarly prone to offering praise to the books of certain writers--regardless of the quality.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never entirely understood why Salinger&#8217;s novel is so highly regarded; I love &#8220;The Old Man and the Sea&#8221;, a book which, despite its slender spine, takes some effort to finish.  </p>
<p>Regardless, I can&#8217;t help but feel that it is at least somewhat fashionable for a reviewer to attack books that are held in high esteem.  Dale Peck certainly comes to mind.  (I&#8217;m sure one could argue that reviewers are similarly prone to offering praise to the books of certain writers&#8211;regardless of the quality.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
