<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ‘There Is a Difference Between a Book Review and a Book Recommendation’ – Quote of the Day / Bethanne Patrick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/%E2%80%98there-is-a-difference-between-a-book-review-and-a-book-recommendation%E2%80%99-%E2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-bethanne-patrick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/%e2%80%98there-is-a-difference-between-a-book-review-and-a-book-recommendation%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-bethanne-patrick/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/%e2%80%98there-is-a-difference-between-a-book-review-and-a-book-recommendation%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-bethanne-patrick/#comment-7721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1minutebookreviewswordpresscom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=15249#comment-7721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see the differences in a similar way. A review presupposes a level of analysis that a recommendation doesn&#039;t: A reader of a review has reason to expect that you&#039;ve considered both the strengths and weaknesses of a book even if you focus on the strengths in your comments. A recommendation is just that -- an endorsement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the differences in a similar way. A review presupposes a level of analysis that a recommendation doesn&#8217;t: A reader of a review has reason to expect that you&#8217;ve considered both the strengths and weaknesses of a book even if you focus on the strengths in your comments. A recommendation is just that &#8212; an endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Aaron Sayban</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/09/14/%e2%80%98there-is-a-difference-between-a-book-review-and-a-book-recommendation%e2%80%99-%e2%80%93-quote-of-the-day-bethanne-patrick/#comment-7720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad Aaron Sayban]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 23:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=15249#comment-7720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the difference is that a review requires a person to actually support why they think a book is good or not good.  A recommendation is simply a knee-jerk emotional response to whether or not you liked happened to like the book.  The most difficult problem with trying to become a &#039;reviewer&#039; in this brave new world we are now in is differentiating yourself from the avalanche of comments that contribute nothing more than &#039;that book sucks!&#039; or &#039;that&#039;s the greatest book ever!&#039;  There is no longer the ready-made audience with newspapers twenty years ago that provides a reviewer with a certain level of credibility from the start.  

I still haven&#039;t figured out if this is a great thing or the end of civilization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the difference is that a review requires a person to actually support why they think a book is good or not good.  A recommendation is simply a knee-jerk emotional response to whether or not you liked happened to like the book.  The most difficult problem with trying to become a &#8216;reviewer&#8217; in this brave new world we are now in is differentiating yourself from the avalanche of comments that contribute nothing more than &#8216;that book sucks!&#8217; or &#8216;that&#8217;s the greatest book ever!&#8217;  There is no longer the ready-made audience with newspapers twenty years ago that provides a reviewer with a certain level of credibility from the start.  </p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t figured out if this is a great thing or the end of civilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
