<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elizabeth Strout&#8217;s &#8216;Olive Kitteridge&#8217; Is Not &#8216;A Novel&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/elizabeth-strouts-olive-kitteridge-is-not-a-novel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/elizabeth-strouts-olive-kitteridge-is-not-a-novel/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 02:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/elizabeth-strouts-olive-kitteridge-is-not-a-novel/#comment-7472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1minutebookreviewswordpresscom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=10086#comment-7472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&lt;strong&gt;Even if they are deceived, it is obvious that the reason they are marketing it that way is to attract a wider audience ...&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; My point exactly. 

&lt;strong&gt; &quot;and how is more people reading or stepping outside their comfort level to read in any way a bad thing?&quot; &lt;/strong&gt; I have no problem with asking readers to step outside their comfort zones, and I ask this of them regularly. But if readers are being asked to step outside their comfort zones, they should know this before they whip out their Visa cards, not after.

&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Memoirs that turn out to be untrue are never deceptive on the part of the publisher&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; Neither you nor anyone else can know this for a fact. Some recent memoirs raise a lot of questions about what publishers knew and when they knew it. Sarah Crichton at Farrar, Straus, for example, has consistently refused to say how she checked the facts in &lt;em&gt;A Long Way Gone&lt;/em&gt; and has very tightly controlled the questions the media have been allowed to ask Ishmael Beah about the book that he calls a &quot;memoir.&quot; And I&#039;m not convinced that readers know all they should about that book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<strong>Even if they are deceived, it is obvious that the reason they are marketing it that way is to attract a wider audience &#8230;&#8221;</strong> My point exactly. </p>
<p><strong> &#8220;and how is more people reading or stepping outside their comfort level to read in any way a bad thing?&#8221; </strong> I have no problem with asking readers to step outside their comfort zones, and I ask this of them regularly. But if readers are being asked to step outside their comfort zones, they should know this before they whip out their Visa cards, not after.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Memoirs that turn out to be untrue are never deceptive on the part of the publisher&#8221;</strong> Neither you nor anyone else can know this for a fact. Some recent memoirs raise a lot of questions about what publishers knew and when they knew it. Sarah Crichton at Farrar, Straus, for example, has consistently refused to say how she checked the facts in <em>A Long Way Gone</em> and has very tightly controlled the questions the media have been allowed to ask Ishmael Beah about the book that he calls a &#8220;memoir.&#8221; And I&#8217;m not convinced that readers know all they should about that book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
