<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Definition of Science Fiction (Quote of the Day / Bookseller Stephen E. Andrews)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/a-new-definition-of-science-fiction-quote-of-the-day-bookseller-stephen-e-andrews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/a-new-definition-of-science-fiction-quote-of-the-day-bookseller-stephen-e-andrews/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackprussia</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/a-new-definition-of-science-fiction-quote-of-the-day-bookseller-stephen-e-andrews/#comment-6672</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackprussia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=1411#comment-6672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only reason the boundaries between SF and Fantasy &#039;are getting worse&#039; is because readers have spent insufficient time thinking about SF, reading it and remembering that its novelties must be &#039;explained&#039; as science, not &#039;excused&#039; as magic. Once you have magic in a story (or the supernatural, call it what you will), it&#039;s Fantasy, not Science Fiction. 

To decide on the exact nature of a genre work, a lot of rigorous looking at the content &#039;evidence&#039; of a individual novel or story is necessary. Once you have eliminated the improbable (advanced science), then only the impossible (the supernatural) remains. Try my definition against any story or novel that is a Romance (the term we should use for fantastic literature generally, as it can encompass SF and Fantasy) as opposed to Realism, and see if the content that makes it a Romance is explained &#039;scientifically&#039; by the author - do they use extrapolation of biology, physics, sociology to explain thier novelty ? Or do they rely on involing the supernatural?

Arthur C Clarke once said that to a less advanced civlisation, a highly advanced technology looks like magic. Some have seen this as muddying the waters, suggesting that magic (if it exists) is simply science we don&#039;t understand yet. Once magic (if it exists) is explained scientifically, it will cease to be supernatural and become science...in which case all Fantasy will become SF.

Stephen E. Andrews]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason the boundaries between SF and Fantasy &#8216;are getting worse&#8217; is because readers have spent insufficient time thinking about SF, reading it and remembering that its novelties must be &#8216;explained&#8217; as science, not &#8216;excused&#8217; as magic. Once you have magic in a story (or the supernatural, call it what you will), it&#8217;s Fantasy, not Science Fiction. </p>
<p>To decide on the exact nature of a genre work, a lot of rigorous looking at the content &#8216;evidence&#8217; of a individual novel or story is necessary. Once you have eliminated the improbable (advanced science), then only the impossible (the supernatural) remains. Try my definition against any story or novel that is a Romance (the term we should use for fantastic literature generally, as it can encompass SF and Fantasy) as opposed to Realism, and see if the content that makes it a Romance is explained &#8216;scientifically&#8217; by the author &#8211; do they use extrapolation of biology, physics, sociology to explain thier novelty ? Or do they rely on involing the supernatural?</p>
<p>Arthur C Clarke once said that to a less advanced civlisation, a highly advanced technology looks like magic. Some have seen this as muddying the waters, suggesting that magic (if it exists) is simply science we don&#8217;t understand yet. Once magic (if it exists) is explained scientifically, it will cease to be supernatural and become science&#8230;in which case all Fantasy will become SF.</p>
<p>Stephen E. Andrews</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
