<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Publishers’ Reading Group Guides Deceptive? Quote of the Day (Gail Pool)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/are-publishers%E2%80%99-reading-group-guides-deceptive-quote-of-the-day-gail-pool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/are-publishers%e2%80%99-reading-group-guides-deceptive-quote-of-the-day-gail-pool/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/are-publishers%e2%80%99-reading-group-guides-deceptive-quote-of-the-day-gail-pool/#comment-5645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1minutebookreviewswordpresscom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 05:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=799#comment-5645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting parallel. The possible connection between readers&#039; guides and teachers&#039; notes hadn&#039;t occurred to me. I agree that lot of mediocre books are taught in schools and that some of those supposedly objective &quot;notes&quot; don&#039;t help.

The publishers&#039; guides, though, seem to be in a class by themselves. Many teachers at least choose the books they teach and believe they&#039;re good. Publishers&#039; guides are often written by freelancers who may not even have that level of commitment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting parallel. The possible connection between readers&#8217; guides and teachers&#8217; notes hadn&#8217;t occurred to me. I agree that lot of mediocre books are taught in schools and that some of those supposedly objective &#8220;notes&#8221; don&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>The publishers&#8217; guides, though, seem to be in a class by themselves. Many teachers at least choose the books they teach and believe they&#8217;re good. Publishers&#8217; guides are often written by freelancers who may not even have that level of commitment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knightofswords</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2008/02/19/are-publishers%e2%80%99-reading-group-guides-deceptive-quote-of-the-day-gail-pool/#comment-5640</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knightofswords]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/?p=799#comment-5640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder if the guides started out simply as extensions of the kinds of notes a teacher might have for the books of &quot;the canon&quot; that we studied in school. My volatile opinion, long before I knew any better, was that some of the stuff we were reading wasn&#039;t as good as other stuff. Wrong. I just didn&#039;t understand it yet. Suffice it to say, we weren&#039;t there to bash the canon even though I felt like doing it. If the guides begin with the assumption that the book isn&#039;t be taught in a school class if it&#039;s not good, then, they won&#039;t do any bashing either. Somehow, though, the guides seem to have crossed the line and have become gushy as in, say, five thumbs up or you&#039;ll laugh till you pee.

Malcolm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the guides started out simply as extensions of the kinds of notes a teacher might have for the books of &#8220;the canon&#8221; that we studied in school. My volatile opinion, long before I knew any better, was that some of the stuff we were reading wasn&#8217;t as good as other stuff. Wrong. I just didn&#8217;t understand it yet. Suffice it to say, we weren&#8217;t there to bash the canon even though I felt like doing it. If the guides begin with the assumption that the book isn&#8217;t be taught in a school class if it&#8217;s not good, then, they won&#8217;t do any bashing either. Somehow, though, the guides seem to have crossed the line and have become gushy as in, say, five thumbs up or you&#8217;ll laugh till you pee.</p>
<p>Malcolm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
