<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Best Things I Never Wrote: Quote of the Day #8 &#8230; On Pompous Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/</link>
	<description>Janice Harayda Reviews Fiction, Nonfiction and Poetry for Adults and Children</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heehler</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[heehler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/#comment-607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wunderwood. I can assure you that the word was meant sincerely, and not ironically, and I could not disagree with you more. Wearisome is a legitimate word, and without any pretension whatsoever. What I do find pretentious however, are those literary critics among us with the audacity (I’m sorry, nerve) to malign (sorry, criticize) the use of a word like wearisome.

If you are to have your way, then what are we to do with the remaining 98% of the English language? God forbid someone would attempt to raise the bar a little by going with wearisome, rather than tired. Personally, I would have used tiresome.  

Me thinks you’ve been reading too much Strunk and White. 

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wunderwood. I can assure you that the word was meant sincerely, and not ironically, and I could not disagree with you more. Wearisome is a legitimate word, and without any pretension whatsoever. What I do find pretentious however, are those literary critics among us with the audacity (I’m sorry, nerve) to malign (sorry, criticize) the use of a word like wearisome.</p>
<p>If you are to have your way, then what are we to do with the remaining 98% of the English language? God forbid someone would attempt to raise the bar a little by going with wearisome, rather than tired. Personally, I would have used tiresome.  </p>
<p>Me thinks you’ve been reading too much Strunk and White. </p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1minutebookreviewswordpresscom</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1minutebookreviewswordpresscom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/#comment-138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point about &quot;wearisome.&quot; I don&#039;t care for that word and don&#039;t think I&#039;ve used it in this blog. I also like Vonnegut&#039;s explanation, though I&#039;d put the age limit a little higher. I teach writing to college students, who often confuse pomposity with erudition or, worse, think it&#039;s what the professors want. A colleague of mine, a high-level editor at a major book publishing firm, said that he used to tell authors whose writing was pretentious: &quot;Explain this the way you would explain it to your mother.&quot; I&#039;ve borrowed that line many times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about &#8220;wearisome.&#8221; I don&#8217;t care for that word and don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve used it in this blog. I also like Vonnegut&#8217;s explanation, though I&#8217;d put the age limit a little higher. I teach writing to college students, who often confuse pomposity with erudition or, worse, think it&#8217;s what the professors want. A colleague of mine, a high-level editor at a major book publishing firm, said that he used to tell authors whose writing was pretentious: &#8220;Explain this the way you would explain it to your mother.&#8221; I&#8217;ve borrowed that line many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunderwood</title>
		<link>http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wunderwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oneminutebookreviews.wordpress.com/2007/02/15/the-best-things-i-never-wrote-quote-of-the-day-8-on-pompous-writing/#comment-137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would be more convincing if it ended with &quot;is tiring to read.&quot; I really hope that &quot;wearisome&quot; was intentionally pompous. It would be sad if it wasn&#039;t.

And after all, some weathermen are not meteorologists. Some are even women. Disadvantaged is not the same thing as poor.

I prefer Kurt Vonnegut&#039;s version, that if you can&#039;t explain it to a ten year old, you don&#039;t understand it. Once you can do that, you&#039;ve proven you don&#039;t need the fancy words, so don&#039;t put them back in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be more convincing if it ended with &#8220;is tiring to read.&#8221; I really hope that &#8220;wearisome&#8221; was intentionally pompous. It would be sad if it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>And after all, some weathermen are not meteorologists. Some are even women. Disadvantaged is not the same thing as poor.</p>
<p>I prefer Kurt Vonnegut&#8217;s version, that if you can&#8217;t explain it to a ten year old, you don&#8217;t understand it. Once you can do that, you&#8217;ve proven you don&#8217;t need the fancy words, so don&#8217;t put them back in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
